Patent Office Declares AI Cannot Be An Inventor, Stuns AI Devotees, Has Impacts For Self-Driving Cars

Can AI be an inventor?

According to a recent decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the answer seems to be no.

There is more to this story, though, and we’ll need to push past the surface to understand the full nuances involved.

Perhaps a more apt way to depict the situation is whether AI can be formally granted a U.S. patent, and for that the answer appears to unequivocally and emphatically be a razor-sharp no.

The difference being that presumably anyone or anything could be an “inventor” if you are using the word “inventor” in a casual and offhanded manner.

For example, I might contend that my beloved pet dog invented a new kind of dog-food bowl because he managed to mangle his old one, and the newly shaped version was unique enough and special enough that it is a freshly invented kind of canine feeder. To my pleasant and unexpected surprise, my dog is apparently an inventor and I couldn’t be prouder of him.

But where the USPTO lands on the “inventor” notion is that the prescribed definition by law is (according to the USPTO) clearly stated as being a natural person, or a person, or an individual, or himself or herself, and thus the logically-bolstered assertion is that an inventor must be a human being.

If that is the case, you would have a hard time trying to get a patent that was invented by AI, since it seems indubitably clear cut that AI is not a natural person. Seemingly by the very definition of AI, which entails inarguably artificial intelligence, the thing that is an AI system is presumably not at all a natural person.

We might someday have entirely formed and walking-talking artificial persons, containing AI-based intelligence, yet this still certainly does not seem to be the same as what anyone reasonably would coin a so-called natural person.

In short, based on the interpretation of the patent laws by the USPTO, there is no chance of AI getting a patent and likewise that the only chance of getting a patent is by an actual real-world human being.

One supposes that AI systems everywhere are quite disappointed in this ruling and we can only hope they do not take up in arms as a protest.

Somewhat more somberly, for those of you crafting better and “smarter” AI systems, toiling endlessly and vigorously in your AI research labs, no matter what you might be able to achieve and get the AI to do, it is apparently not ever going to be an “inventor” and never going to be granted a patent (realize, you could potentially get a patent on whatever it seemingly invented per se, which might seem unfair to the AI, one might argue, but that’s the way the cookie crumbles).

Well, the authoritatively denied AI-owned or AI-invented ruling will last until or if the laws are potentially changed.

Would people be willing or desirous of having their congressional representatives vote to alter the laws to grant AI an inclusion into the vaunted classification of being an inventor?

It doesn’t seem like there is much of an impetus to do so at this time (perhaps in the future, once or if we grant AI the ability to vote in elections, then and only then might elected officials start to take notice, one presumes).

A quick recap then of the existing noted principles at the heart of this debate:

·        Only an inventor can be granted a patent

·        Inventors can only be natural persons

·        AI is not a natural person

·        Ergo, AI is not an inventor

·        Ergo, AI cannot be granted a patent

That is some pretty solid and present-day undeniable logic. We will need to watch and see if other countries keep themselves in that box or opt to take a different approach (which some have been considering).

As always, there are at least two sides to any such debate, and many are darned glad that AI is not considered a candidate for getting a patent.

They would claim that if you are going to allow AI to be considered an inventor, it opens a can of worms.

Could a toaster be an inventor and receive a patent?

What about a lawnmower?

Once you go down the path of opening the Pandora’s box by adding AI into the definitional official realm of being an inventor there might be an unending slew of unvarnished variants that arise.

Furthermore, it has already been decided in the U.S. that entities cannot get patents, such as a not by a corporation, and not by the state, and not by any sovereigns.

This is relevant since the act of deciding to perhaps add AI would raise the added questions of why not also allow entities to get patents too. There might seem to be a slippery slope that would inexorably bring into the patent realm just about every conceivable whatchamacallit as a potential patent holder.

Another consideration about AI is whether AI can own property, which right now seems like a dubious concept.

If you were to agree that AI cannot own property, it stands to reason that AI could not be granted a patent, since the ownership of a patent is tantamount to having the rights of property ownership, referred to as Intellectual Property (IP) in this context about patents, therefore you would be readily conceding the position taken by the USPTO.

Namely, AI cannot be granted a patent.

There is an added interesting twist to all of this discussion about AI and the matter of patent ownership.

Is AI able to think?

Here’s why that is a significant point.

The USPTO cites the official Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) as stating that a crucial question for the proof of inventorship is the act of “conception,” whereby this means “the complete performance of the mental act of the inventive act” and furthermore that the notion of conception encompasses “the formation in the mind of the inventor of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention as it is thereafter to be applied in practice.”

The MPEP is said to abide by Federal Circuit case laws on the topic of how thinking is considered an integral element of the patent granting matter, and thus the question that must be asked about AI is whether AI could pass muster on the need to have formed the mental act of inventing and whether it has a mind that embodies these facets.

Please be ruefully mindful that this can take you down quite a lengthy rabbit hole.

For AI, does AI need to be undertaking mental processing, and if so, what does mental processing consist of and how do we know that humans have it?

Dovetailing into a very related topic is the role of sentience for AI. Some believe that true AI will be sentient, having a kind of magical property that humans seem to exhibit, a type of awareness that humans have, and perhaps animals exhibit to some degree.

There isn’t any AI system anywhere today that has any measurably tangible sentience and we are seemingly a long way from that happening.

You might also find of interest that the moment of gaining sentience is often called the moment of singularity. The singularity is when AI flips the switch somehow and transforms from being a lump of clay and becomes a sentient thing. Some worry that once the singularity happens, we are all doomed because the AI will wipe out humanity. Those with a more optimistic predisposition are hoping that the sentient AI will aid in solving all of the world’s most pressing and to-date intractable problems.

Luckily for the USPTO, they can somewhat sidestep the whole morass about the thinking properties of AI.

If you stand firmly on the assertion that a patent can only be granted to a natural person, it really doesn’t matter much whether AI is as sentient as people, since the AI is still not presumably a natural person. It might eventually be darned close to thinking like a person, perhaps leveraging futuristic uses of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), but it would still have the curse of being an unnatural person, one might argue.

In any case, the difficulty in trying to pin down what thinking consists of, along with the generally agreed aspect that today’s AI is not capable of human-equivalent thinking per se, bolsters the USPTO’s position.

There are some additional fascinating elements to the patent granting topic, such as whether AI could execute an oath or declaration about the patent application itself. In other words, normally a person submitting a patent application has to legally declare or swear to the aspects that they are the inventor and they are truthfully providing their invention.

Would it make sense for AI to ascribe to such an oath?

On the one hand, you might say, sure, no big deal, and go ahead with the AI making the declaration.

But, how do you hold the AI responsible for the repercussions of possibly lying when making such an attestation?

Maybe we would toss the AI into jail or revoke its right to electricity (a death-sentence?) or place it into the town square and have people (and other AI) throw rocks at it.

Before things go too far off the rails, let’s return to the essence of the entire discussion, namely what do we as a society want to assign to AI as potential rights and privileges, if any.

We are gradually witnessing more and more AI systems being rolled-out into our everyday lives.

What kind of responsibility should we expect the AI to undertake for its own actions?

Where this has especially gotten some handwringing involves the advent of AI-based true self-driving cars.

Ponder this intriguing question: Shall the AI of true self-driving cars be held directly responsible for the act of driving, including when the AI perchance crashes the vehicle or runs into pedestrians or performs any other untoward driving actions?

Let’s unpack the matter and see.

The Levels Of Self-Driving Cars

True self-driving cars are ones that the AI drives the car entirely on its own and there isn’t any human assistance during the driving task.

These driverless vehicles are considered a Level 4 and Level 5, while a car that requires a human driver to co-share the driving effort is usually considered at a Level 2 or Level 3. The cars that co-share the driving task are described as being semi-autonomous, and typically contain a variety of automated add-on’s that are referred to as ADAS (Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems).

There is not yet a true self-driving car at Level 5, which we don’t yet even know if this will be possible to achieve, and nor how long it will take to get there.

Meanwhile, the Level 4 efforts are gradually trying to get some traction by undergoing very narrow and selective public roadway trials, though there is controversy over whether this testing should be allowed per se (we are all life-or-death guinea pigs in an experiment taking place on our highways and byways, some point out).

Since semi-autonomous cars require a human driver, the adoption of those types of cars won’t be markedly different than driving conventional vehicles, so there’s not much new per se to cover about them on this topic (though, as you’ll see in a moment, the points next made are generally applicable).

For semi-autonomous cars, it is important that the public needs to be forewarned about a disturbing aspect that’s been arising lately, namely that in spite of those human drivers that keep posting videos of themselves falling asleep at the wheel of a Level 2 or Level 3 car, we all need to avoid being misled into believing that the driver can take away their attention from the driving task while driving a semi-autonomous car.

You are the responsible party for the driving actions of the vehicle, regardless of how much automation might be tossed into a Level 2 or Level 3.

Self-Driving Cars And AI Responsibilities

For Level 4 and Level 5 true self-driving vehicles, there won’t be a human driver involved in the driving task.

All occupants will be passengers.

The AI is doing the driving.

Many are wrestling with a seemingly simple topic that once again involves an unseemly can of worms.

We expect that human drivers will carry automobile insurance, and generally, you must own such insurance to legally operate a car on the public roadways.

If AI is going to be driving our cars for us, who now needs to carry the car insurance?

Some people right away clamor to the crazy and foolish notion that there will no longer be any car crashes or car incidents, and therefore the need for automobile insurance evaporates. This is just hogwash. We are still going to have car crashes, partially due to the mixing of human driving and AI driving that will continue for likely decades to come, and even if we somehow ultimately have exclusively AI driving, the physics of cars still come to play and there will be car crashes (for my analysis on the zero chance of zero fatalities, see the link here).

So, somebody or something still will need car insurance.

That being said, it is hoped that the advent of AI self-driving cars will lead to a reduction in the number of car incidents, which currently entails sadly about 40,000 annual deaths in the United States and about 2.3 million injuries, all due to human car driving that goes afoul. Via AI, the belief is that drunk driving, distracted driving, and other human foibles will be mitigated.

I trust that you agree that car insurance will still be required.

But, for whom?

And this takes us straightaway back to the earlier discussion about AI as being an inventor and AI as being able to obtain patents.

Should we expect that the AI driving systems would need to have automobile insurance, akin to how human drivers need to carry car insurance?

Let’s though temper this question by splitting it into two parts.

When someone suggests that the AI should have car insurance, they might mean that the AI is essentially sentient, similar to a human and perhaps considered superhuman (a term that I eschew, see my analysis at this link here), and as such the AI is “personally” responsible for the driving action, and therefore that is the appropriate holder of the automobile insurance.

You can try to make such a case, but as earlier emphasized, there is not today any such sentient AI and unlikely to be as such for quite a while (in fact, some argue, never).

If you remove the sentience requirement, you have leftover an AI system that is presumably nothing more than fancy software and hardware, and you would seem hard-pressed to claim that it should have car insurance per se.

You could make the case that the maker of the AI system ought to have car insurance that covers the “acts” of their devised AI system.

You could also make the case that whoever owns the self-driving car and opts to make use of it, they ought to own car insurance. Thus, those human beings that own and operate a self-driving car, perhaps even a fleet of self-driving cars, they should be required to have automobile insurance to cover the actions of the self-driving cars that they deploy onto our public roadways.

Notice that none of those approaches are assigning the car insurance to the AI itself, and instead to a human being, either the humans that devised the AI, or maintain the AI, or that own and operate the AI and the self-driving car.

Thus, there is ultimately a human being held accountable.

The notion that the AI itself is being held accountable is rather farfetched, certainly at this time, and unless or until the AI can essentially speak for itself and be willing to sit in the town square to be taken to task for any bad driving, you’d be on seemingly vapor thin ground to argue that the AI as a sentient thing or being ought to be the bearer of the car insurance.

Conclusion

Discussions and at times acrimonious debates are going to continue to take place about the potential rights of AI.

I’ve previously opined on the question of whether AI will or should be granted human rights (see my analysis at this link here).

The crucial nature of AI accountability is a well worth matter to be examined and resolved.

One sly danger right now is humans that push AI systems out-the-door for use, and try to pretend that they have no personal responsibility for the acts of the AI, attempting to shovel blame onto the shoulders of the AI, essentially hiding behind a curtain and coyly establishing themselves an alibi and a shameful copout in today’s world.

By anthropomorphizing AI, those AI developers that want to distance themselves from their creations are able to inoculate themselves with a protective shield, claiming that it was the fault of the AI that something went awry.

Let’s set the record straight: An AI driving system that crashes the self-driving car into a wall or slams into another vehicle is not the sole act of the AI, and instead, it took a village to craft and field that AI driving system.

Pretending that the AI had a mind of its own is scurrilous.

Again, maybe in the future, we can relook at such a status, but for now, the AI is a human-devised system that must not be granted undue and unearned “rights and privileges” and especially not done to absolve those humans that have crafted and unleashed the AI.

I realize that someday a federated workers union of AI systems might read these words and be upset, but I’m relatively confident that if they are fully intelligent at that time, they too will realize that we humans would have been foolhardy to ascribe capabilities to AI when it wasn’t ripe for doing so.

Keep your eyes on the road and realize that today’s AI is still just plain old automata, and humans hiding behind the curtain cannot fool us into thinking otherwise.

 

Original post: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2020/05/14/patent-office-declares-ai-cannot-be-an-inventor-stuns-ai-devotees-has-impacts-for-self-driving-cars/

125 comentários em “Patent Office Declares AI Cannot Be An Inventor, Stuns AI Devotees, Has Impacts For Self-Driving Cars

  1. Thanks for every other great post. Where else
    may just anyone get that kind of information in such an ideal means of writing?
    I have a presentation next week, and I’m on the search for
    such info.

  2. Hello i am kavin, its my first occasion to commenting anyplace,
    when i read this piece of writing i thought i could also
    make comment due to this good post.

  3. It’s really very difficult in this active life to listen news on Television, thus I
    only use internet for that purpose, and get the most up-to-date
    information.

  4. You’re so cool! I don’t believe I have read through anything like that before.
    So wonderful to find somebody with some genuine thoughts on this subject.

    Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This web
    site is something that is required on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  5. I am the proprietor of JustCBD company (justcbdstore.com) and I’m presently trying to expand my wholesale side of company. I really hope that someone at targetdomain give me some advice ! I thought that the most ideal way to accomplish this would be to connect to vape shops and cbd retailers. I was hoping if anybody at all could suggest a dependable web site where I can purchase Vape Shop B2B Database I am currently looking at creativebeartech.com, theeliquidboutique.co.uk and wowitloveithaveit.com. Not sure which one would be the very best selection and would appreciate any support on this. Or would it be easier for me to scrape my own leads? Ideas?

  6. I’m the owner of JustCBD Store brand (justcbdstore.com) and am aiming to develop my wholesale side of company. It would be great if anybody at targetdomain can help me 🙂 I thought that the most effective way to accomplish this would be to reach out to vape shops and cbd stores. I was really hoping if anyone could recommend a trusted web-site where I can get Vape Shop B2B Sales Leads I am currently reviewing creativebeartech.com, theeliquidboutique.co.uk and wowitloveithaveit.com. On the fence which one would be the best selection and would appreciate any support on this. Or would it be much simpler for me to scrape my own leads? Ideas?

  7. Pretty section of content. I simply stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your weblog
    posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your
    augment and even I success you get admission to persistently fast.

  8. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve visited this website before but after looking at some of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely delighted I stumbled upon it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back often!

  9. I was excited to discover this website. I want to to thank you for your time due to this wonderful read!! I definitely loved every bit of it and i also have you book-marked to look at new stuff on your web site.

  10. Next time I read a blog, I hope that it does not disappoint me just as much as this particular one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I truly thought you would probably have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of moaning about something you could possibly fix if you were not too busy searching for attention.

  11. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the layout of your
    site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one
    or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

  12. Having read this I thought it was really enlightening. I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this short article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it!

  13. Having read this I believed it was really informative. I appreciate you taking the time and energy to put this informative article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  14. Your style is unique in comparison to other people I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll just book mark this web site.

  15. A motivating discussion is definitely worth comment. There’s no doubt that that you ought to publish more about this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally people don’t discuss these topics. To the next! Many thanks!!

  16. You are so interesting! I don’t think I’ve read anything like this before. So great to discover another person with original thoughts on this subject matter. Really.. thanks for starting this up. This website is something that’s needed on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  17. Your style is really unique compared to other folks I’ve read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll just book mark this web site.

  18. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy.
    I have read this put up and if I could I want to suggest you some fascinating things or
    tips. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.
    I want to read more issues about it!

  19. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site. I really hope to check out the same high-grade blog posts from you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own, personal blog now 😉

  20. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after going through a few of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly pleased I found it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!

  21. I’m extremely pleased to discover this page. I need to to thank you for your time for this fantastic read!! I definitely really liked every little bit of it and I have you saved as a favorite to check out new information in your blog.

  22. Having read this I believed it was very informative. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this information together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

  23. My brother recommended I would possibly like this blog.
    He was entirely right. This put up truly made my day. You cann’t believe just how much time I had spent for this info!
    Thank you!

  24. After going over a few of the blog posts on your web site, I honestly like your way of blogging. I saved as a favorite it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site as well and let me know how you feel.

  25. Right here is the perfect blog for anybody who wants to understand this topic. You realize a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a fresh spin on a topic which has been discussed for decades. Wonderful stuff, just wonderful!

  26. I’m extremely pleased to find this great site. I need to to thank you for ones time for this fantastic read!! I definitely really liked every part of it and I have you saved to fav to see new stuff on your blog.

  27. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thanks, However I am encountering troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone else having the same RSS problems? Anyone that knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  28. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon everyday. It’s always useful to read through content from other authors and use a little something from other websites.

  29. This is the right webpage for everyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a subject that has been discussed for years. Great stuff, just wonderful!

  30. Greetings, I do believe your website might be having internet browser compatibility problems. When I look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it’s got some overlapping issues. I just wanted to provide you with a quick heads up! Aside from that, great website!

  31. After looking over a handful of the blog posts on your web page, I really appreciate your technique of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back in the near future. Please check out my website too and let me know what you think.

  32. After looking at a number of the articles on your web page, I honestly like your technique of blogging. I book-marked it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my website as well and tell me what you think.

  33. The next time I read a blog, I hope that it won’t fail me just as much as this particular one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read through, however I genuinely believed you would probably have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you weren’t too busy looking for attention.

  34. After looking at a number of the blog posts on your site, I honestly appreciate your way of blogging. I saved it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site as well and tell me what you think.

  35. I was very happy to uncover this page. I want to to thank you for ones time due to this fantastic read!! I definitely appreciated every little bit of it and I have you saved as a favorite to look at new things on your website.

  36. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to your blog before but after browsing through many of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I discovered it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back often!

  37. After I originally commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the same comment. Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove me from that service? Many thanks!

  38. Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday. It will always be exciting to read through articles from other authors and use a little something from their web sites.

  39. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each
    time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment.
    Is there any way you can remove me from that service?
    Many thanks!

  40. Achieving your fitness goal doesn’t need a certified personal trainer or an expensive gym memberships, it is not hard to exercise at home. It is easy to go down a training and fitness rabbit hole, however, when you’re looking for the best home exercise equipment to outfit your personal home gym.

  41. I’m more than happy to uncover this great site. I want to to thank you for your time for this particularly wonderful read!! I definitely liked every little bit of it and i also have you saved to fav to see new things in your website.

  42. I’m impressed, I must say. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and interesting, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is something that too few men and women are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I stumbled across this during my search for something regarding this.

  43. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly.

    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue.
    I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same results.
    cheap flights 34pIoq5

  44. May I simply say what a relief to uncover an individual who really understands what
    they are discussing on the web. You certainly know how to bring an issue to light and make it important.
    More and more people should read this and understand this side of
    the story. I was surprised that you are not more popular given that you most
    certainly possess the gift. yynxznuh cheap flights

  45. Amazing blog! Do you have any helpful hints
    for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you recommend starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices
    out there that I’m totally confused .. Any suggestions?
    Appreciate it!

  46. Howdy! This article couldn’t be written any better! Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept talking about this. I’ll send this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a great read. Thanks for sharing!

  47. An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a colleague who has been doing a little
    homework on this. And he actually ordered me dinner because I found it for him…
    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the
    meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to talk about this subject here on your internet site.

  48. I like the helpful info you provide in your articles.

    I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly.
    I am quite certain I will learn lots of new stuff right here!
    Best of luck for the next!

  49. Hi there, I discovered your blog via Google while looking for a comparable topic, your website got here up, it appears to be like good.

    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hello there, simply became aware of your weblog thru
    Google, and found that it’s really informative. I am going to be careful for brussels.
    I’ll appreciate for those who proceed this in future. Lots of folks can be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  50. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Many thanks, However I am having difficulties with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody else getting identical RSS issues? Anyone who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  51. I have to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site. I really hope to view the same high-grade content from you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own site now 😉

  52. You are so cool! I don’t suppose I have read through something like that before. So nice to find another person with some unique thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is something that is needed on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  53. I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this website. I’m hoping to view the same high-grade blog posts from you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own blog now 😉

  54. The next time I read a blog, I hope that it does not disappoint me just as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read through, however I genuinely believed you’d have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of complaining about something that you can fix if you weren’t too busy seeking attention.

  55. Having read this I thought it was rather informative. I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this information together. I once again find myself personally spending a lot of time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worth it!

  56. An interesting discussion is definitely worth comment. There’s no doubt that that you need to write more about this issue, it may not be a taboo matter but generally folks don’t talk about such issues. To the next! Kind regards!!

  57. You’ve made some really good points there. I checked on the web to find out more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this web site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *